2020-11-22
2021-06-15
2021-06-15
1
NCT04298242
Stanford University
Stanford University
INTERVENTIONAL
Magnetic Resonance Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treatment
The primary purpose of this protocol is to assess the ExAblate 2100 MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound device as an intervention for treatment of advanced stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Primary Objective: The primary endpoints for this study will be 1) feasibility of ablation and 2) safety of ablation. Secondary Objective: 1.)Pain reduction after ablation. 2.) Evidence of inflammation at ablation site based on histology, or in blood after ablation
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Registration Dates | Results Reporting Dates | Study Record Updates |
---|---|---|
2020-03-04 | N/A | 2023-11-21 |
2020-03-04 | N/A | 2023-11-22 |
2020-03-06 | N/A | 2023-11 |
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Primary Purpose:
Device Feasibility
Allocation:
Na
Interventional Model:
Single Group
Masking:
None
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: MRgFUS Treatment The pancreatic tumor will be ablated with magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS). | DEVICE: ExAblate 2100
|
Primary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Measure acceptable ablation percentage | Feasibility of ablation, as measured by the number of patients with acceptable ablation percentage. Acceptable ablation percentage is defined as ≥50% of the targeted volume appearing ablated on post-treatment imaging. Ablation will be deemed feasible if at least seven of the ten patients have an acceptable ablation percentage | Immediately after MRgFUS treatment |
Total frequency and severity of adverse events | Safety of ablation, as measured by the total frequency and severity of adverse events. Adverse events will be categorized and grade for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0. Ablation will be deemed safe if there are no treatment-related serious adverse events, and no more than five moderate or mild treatment-related adverse events, among the ten patients during follow up. | 24 months |
Secondary Outcome Measures | Measure Description | Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Assess Pain Response assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) | Reduction in pain level, as measured by: a. a decline in pain score after one week of at least 2 points, or a pain score < 4 out of 10, as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory. Ablation will be deemed pain reducing if at least five of the ten patients have pain reduction. | Baseline, 1 week, and monthly for 24 months following treatment |
Assess Pain Response assessed by morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) | Reduction in pain level will be measured by a decline after one week in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of 25%. Ablation will be deemed pain reducing if at least five of the ten patients have pain reduction. | Baseline, 1 week, and monthly for 24 months following treatment |
Evidence of ablation-induced inflammation | Evidence of ablation-induced inflammation, defined as post-ablation increases in histologic and/or blood measures of inflammation markers, as measured by either: 1. an increase in tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells 2. a decrease in immune suppressive cells (Tregs, macrophages) in the tumor 3. an increase in immune activation signatures (including interferon gamma) in the tumor as measured by RNAseq 4. a change in immune profile in the circulating immune cells (PBMCs) to reflect an activated immune response (e.g. activated T or B cells, reduction in immune suppressive cells or cytokines) Ablation will be deemed inflammation-inducing if at least five of the ten patients show at least a 50% increase in inflammation on at least 2 of the 4 markers | 1week |
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.
Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL
Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
No publications available
NPCF was founded on May 29, 2009 and is a 501(c)(3) organization. All donations are tax deductible.
The information and services provided by the National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation are for informational purposes only. The information and services are not intended to be substitutes for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. The National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation does not recommend nor endorse any specific physicians, products or treatments even though they may be mentioned on this site.
Copyright © 2024 – National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation | All Rights Reserved