Clinical Trial Record

Return to Clinical Trials

Registrar Performances in MIDP


2019-12-01


2019-12-30


2020-06-01


71

Study Overview

Registrar Performances in MIDP

This study aimed to determine whether registrar involvement in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) was associated with adverse outcomes.

From January 2009 to March 2020, data of all consecutive patients requiring distal pancreatectomy in our public tertiary hospital were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Registrars were progressively involved for MIDP since 2009 and their experience was: < 5 open pancreatic resections, < 5 MIDP and at least 30 advanced minimally invasive gastrointestinal resections. Outcome of patients who underwent either distal pancreatectomy by the consultant or registrars were compared. Our primary outcome was the conversion rate. The secondary outcomes were 90-days postoperative outcomes including CR-POPF defined and classified according to the 2016 ISGPF definition.

  • Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy
  • PROCEDURE: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy
  • RECHMPL20_0348

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates Results Reporting Dates Study Record Updates

2020-06-09  

N/A  

2020-06-09  

2020-06-09  

N/A  

2020-06-12  

2020-06-12  

N/A  

2020-06  

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

Design Details

Primary Purpose:
N/A


Allocation:
N/A


Interventional Model:
N/A


Masking:
N/A


Arms and Interventions

Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
: Group 1 (Registrar)

Group 1 (Registrar): Patients who underwent minimally invasive distale pancreatectomy for benign or borderline pathology operated on by a registrar (young specialist surgeon)

PROCEDURE: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

  • Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy
: Group 2 (Consultant)

Group 2 (Consultant): Patients who underwent minimally invasive distale pancreatectomy for benign or borderline pathology operated on by a consultant (expert)

PROCEDURE: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

  • Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy
Primary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
open conversion rateNecessity to swith from minimally invasive approach to open approach during laparoscopy1 day
Secondary Outcome MeasuresMeasure DescriptionTime Frame
Duration of surgeryDuration of surgery1 day
Intraoperative bloodlossIntraoperative bloodloss1 day
Intraoperative transfusionIntraoperative transfusion1 day
severe complications Clavien Dindo>3severe complications Clavien Dindo>390 days postoperative
postoperative complicationspostoperative complications90 days postoperative
clinically relevant postoperative fistulaclinically relevant postoperative fistula (2016 ISGPF definition)90 days postoperative
lenght of hospital staylenght of hospital stay90 days postoperative
readmission ratereadmission rate90 days postoperative
reoperation ratereoperation rate90 days postoperative

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person’s general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:
ALL

Sexes Eligible for Study:
18 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

    Inclusion criteria:
    - Patients who underwent minimally invasive distale pancreatectomy for benign or borderline pathology between 2009-2020
    Exclusion criteria:

  • open distal pancreatectomy
  • minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer
  • 20 first consecutive patients operated on by the consultant (learning curve)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.


    • STUDY_DIRECTOR: REGIS SOUCHE, University Hospital, Montpellier

    Publications

    The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

    General Publications

    No publications available